Skip to content

Features

In-text Revision/Report : Teacher's Perspective

Why is it cool?

You want to go to the bottom of a source alert and see how the student resolved it, in order to

  • … provide assistance as to how to work better in the future (pedagogical feedback)
    or
  • …. to investigate misconduct:
    • verify if a source alert is classified correctly
    • inspect the writing pattern history for any suspicious section of text 

You can easily cycle through all source alerts and for each one, see exactly in the text, where it occurred and classify the alerts accordingly.

  • Usability
    • In case a source alert is categorized as “AI revised” but does not contain background information like the prompt history, you can inspect its creation history: look at the words that belong to deltas which have been there before the alerted change delta – there should have been enough content already to justify the classification as “revision”, otherwise it could be considered AI generated.
    • In case a section of text does have a very different writing style, or another AI detection tool alerted you that it is suspicious: open the intext report, highlight the corresponding text and inspect the writing activity history – a machine like pattern would have very few changes and have created the section in a relatively short time period, while humans often do frequent changes and revise a text multiple times.

© 2024 Mentafy. All Rights Reserved.